#1

They did indeed send chocolate.
#2

#3

I still should leave an online review about it because after looking up “Fabletics scam” it seems to happen to a lot of people.
Few people read the fine print when it is physically in print, and probably fewer do it when it’s in the digital environment. The Pew Research Center has found that just 9% of adults read a company’s privacy policy before agreeing to the terms and conditions, while more than a third (36%) say they never do it.
With a simple click of a button, people give websites the right to keep, analyze, and sell their data to third parties without realizing it. Often, people also click away their right to go to court if anything goes wrong.
#4

#5

#6

The data that internet users agree to give away is especially useful to advertisers, who can then tailor their content to consumers' preferences. A part of such data can also end up in the hands of health insurers, life insurance companies, and even employers, all of which can make important decisions according to it and have quite an effect on our lives.
#7

No, really:
>However, this restriction will not apply in the event of the occurrence (certified by the United States Centers for Disease Control or successor body) of a widespread viral infection transmitted via bites or contact with bodily fluids that causes human corpses to reanimate and seek to consume living human flesh, blood, brain or nerve tissue and is likely to result in the fall of organized civilization.
#8

#9

A solution to this problem is obvious - to read the terms and conditions we’re presented with. But realistically, if we read each one, we’d spend around eight hours a week doing that. That’s almost a whole day we lose in a week. Who has time for that?
To help with this issue, ToS;DR ("Terms of Service; Didn't Read"), a free browser extension, was created. It labels and rates agreements you’re presented with from very good to very bad. It aids in unearthing the worrisome things and prevents you from signing your life away.
#10

#11

The contract to a job I had working in the desert warned about the frequency of alien attacks. I was disappointed to go a year and a half without any, though.
#12

#13

#14

Curious as to how the scam worked, I looked at their T&Cs.
There was a clause in there requiring you to pay $10000 in compensation to the company if you filed a chargeback against their fees.
Whilst that would never stand up in court, dealing with debt collectors who might conveniently offer to settle for 'a mere three thousand' would be all sorts of hell.
#15

I think I still have it at my desk - my job in part is writing terms and conditions, agreements, and disclosures for the bank I work at so I actually do read a lot of T&Cs in homage to the amount of time my colleagues in the field put into writing 18 pages of s**t no one but examiners read. The Canadian math requirement is the strangest I've ever seen.
#16

#17

#18

The update said it was just adding the ability to give group chats a sub-heading.
What it was *actually* doing was giving Facebook permission to take information. This option was enabled by default (of course it was) and you had only 3 months to notice this had happened before the option to opt out was disabled.
I was late noticing this, but when I read the terms and conditions, the last line said something along the lines of, "Even if you opt out, Facebook and the Facebook family of companies will *still* take the data for.....training purposes."
Aaaaand deleted my account. They probably had my info by that point but f**k that s**t. Installed Signal.
#19

#20

loopsydoopsy:
They can also use your videos in their advertisements without your permission, even if the videos are private. Cody Ko had to deal with this.
_NITRISS_:
Hippity hoppity your Tik-Tok is my property


