
#1

#2

#3
'Better safe than sorry' is what we call a precautionary principle. Even if we don't know if a certain thing will lead to harm, we should still take measures to prevent it. It is applicable in innovation, when evaluating environmental and health risks, or just in simple everyday life.
And just like everything else in life, it has its fans and critics. Especially amongst policymakers. Proponents claim that it can protect human health and the environment. Its critics say that it stunts innovation and is not based on scientific research.
For example, if a government is preparing to release a new medicine, it has to be thoroughly tested. So it can't be widely available from the get-go. But what if that new medicine could cure serious diseases? Shouldn't the government give it to all those who are in need? That's why sometimes the principle can be quite controversial.
#4

#5

#6

Our need to better be safe than sorry can also explain anxiety disorders. Psychiatrist Randolph Nesse uses the smoke detector theory to link the two together. This way, he explains why people are having panic attacks in situations where they are quite safe.
"I started realizing that it's essential for alarms to go off," professor emeritus at the University Of Michigan said. "Even if there's just a chance of danger. When the threat is uncertain, false alarms are worth it." It’s better to be safe than sorry. "We want to ensure we get warned about every single fire."
So anxiety acts as a defense mechanism of sorts. When we feel we might be in some kind of danger, our brains tell us that it's better to be safe than sorry and ring that panic attack alarm. "If there's a lot of danger lurking outside, it’s essential to your survival to have anxiety every time you leave the house, so you can be more hypervigilant and prepared to protect yourself," psychiatrist Joanna Cheek adds.
#7

#8

#9

But is the 'better safe than sorry' rule always true? While all the entries on this list confirm the proverb, it doesn't quite work in all scenarios. Leadership coach Sylvia Lafair writes that it might not be so helpful in your career. The 'better safe than sorry' philosophy might hold you back from potential opportunities and greater career heights.
A Philadelphia-based recruiter, Kenneth L. Johnson, reiterates this claim. "Many of those ready for job placement hold back. They are afraid to take a risk. They claim it's better to be a generalist, to be safe rather than sorry. These folks may be passionate about their vertical talents, yet they hold back."
#10

#11

#12

#13

#14
#15
#16
I was probably an early teen and my parents were leaving to go run an errand but it was kind of early about 8 or 9am so I didn’t want to go and asked to stay home.
My Dad agreed and came to ask me again and I said I wanted to stay. They ended up leaving but turned back around and my dad said, they didn’t want me staying home and I better just get up and go. After some whining I agreed to go.
The police was able to get one of them but the other one got away.
#17
#18

#19

#20



