Abortion is a divisive topic, something that we've covered exhaustively here at Bored Panda. It is one of those things that people will never be able to really agree on. The chances of one 'side' changing their minds and being convinced by the arguments of the other are incredibly slim.
Still, there are effective and respectful ways of making your point about unwanted pregnancies, and anonymously contacting a person to call them a murderer is not one of them. Neither is camping out in front of Planned Parenthood to shout anti-abortion abuse at women getting check-ups.
This exchange, originally shared by the Insufferably Intolerant Science Nerd shows two vastly different methods of stating one's position on abortion laws and ethics; we will leave it up to you to decide which is the most effective. If nothing else, the reasoned, thorough pro-abortion response perfectly puts into words what many people feel about so-called 'pro-lifers' and completely confounds the unsolicited, abusive accusations. Perhaps it could be one of the best comebacks to try if you ever find yourself harangued by placard-waving nutjobs at your local sexual health clinic?
Here's what people had to say about the testy exchange
The nature of the abortion debate is often passionate and intense, with strong emotions on both sides. In discussing the ethics and morals surrounding this issue, it’s crucial to approach conversations with respect and understanding, even if agreement seems unreachable. This resonates well with the perspective shared in a viral interaction where author Patrick S. Tomlinson posed a question that eloquently unsettles typical anti-abortion arguments.
For more insights into this thought-provoking approach, consider exploring how one question can challenge prevailing pro-life views.