#1 FBI Break Into Man's Home Over Lawful Purchases And Statists Cheer

Just have government break into everyone's house and steal s**t, totally cool.
SusanRosenberg:
This is the exact thing that makes me worried about my farm being registered with the USDA.
#2 I See The Leftists Are Still Confusing Net Worth With Cash

Posts like that are the explanation for why 20% of the US population has nothing in retirement and no savings account and 58% have less than $1k saved.
Daily_the_Project21:
Doesn't that just create an incentive to not make more than $999 million? Wouldn't Bezos just sell all his shares, cause the stock to go crashing causing a ripple effect of panic selling, f**k the whole market and economy, and then retire somewhere where none of this matters to him? That's what I'd do.
#3 We Gave You Chance, Now It's $50!

Are people really that f**king dumb?
tosseriffic:
Ironically, life is more tolerable when you keep it in the front of your mind at all times that most people are complete f**king morons. Legitimately half of the people you meet have sub 100 IQ, and one in six has an IQ below 85.
The world was probably never this divided over politics in recent decades. And nowhere is that divide as stark as in the United States. As a 2024 Gallup poll shows, the percentage of moderate voters in America has reached historical lows. Only 34% of Americans describe themselves as moderates, while 37% say they're Republicans and only 25% identify as liberals.
Although those who say they are liberal or very liberal are in the minority, it's still the highest percentage in a long time. In 1992, only 17% of Americans said they were liberals. The percentage of Americans identifying as conservatives has been steady since 1992, when it was 36%.
Still, both conservatives' and liberals' ideologies are at their most extreme in 30 years. 24% of Republicans claim they are 'very conservative,' and 18% of Democrats say they are 'very liberal.'
#4 Mods Aren't Part Of The 14%

Thread
Survey Results
Survey Data
Anon:
Holy s**t they're actually insane.
"14.2% of people believe free speech should all be protected. Why is that?"
"My guess is that a lot of people haven't really put that much thought into it beyond that it allows f*scists a platform."
What.
#5 Rich People Can "Own" People By Paying Them A Lot Of Money

Bruh if you offer someone $1M to clean your house, you're the one getting owned.
Ed_Radley:
It's all relative. If their time is valuable enough to them that they can't even be bothered to pick up after themselves because of the lost value, buy all means pay somebody that $1 million and let the value generation commence.
#6 Government Enforced Monopoly? Must Be Capitalism

IP laws aren't a free market. They are, by definition, a government granted monopoly. While there is ample debate about whether and to what extent IP law and/or its individual components (eg, patent, copyright, trade mark, trade secret) helps or hinders the economy as a whole, it's still a government granted monopoly.
nosmokingbandit:
Any jerk can file a suit against any other jerk for literally any reason. The ability to sue means nothing. We should save our outrage until the ruling.
This extreme divide bleeds out into people's relationships. Some even go as far as to cut contact with relatives or friends who are on the different side of the political ideology spectrum. A 2020 Pew survey showed that Americans had very few friends who supported another presidential candidate.
Republicans and Democrats are really at each other's throats by making assumptions as well. A 2020 study showed that 8 in 10 Republicans believe that the Democratic Party has been taken over by socialists. In turn, 8 in 10 Democrats believe that the Republican Party has been seized by racists.
#7 He Should Be Forced To Give Away More!

If I was a billionaire, I wouldn't donate s**t to anybody. I would still be hated the exact same but have an extra $100 million in wealth.
Anon (OP):
If I were a billionaire I would donate because I want to. It's not morally Okay to force someone to distribute their wealth on the other hand. There is a difference between donation and forced distribution and that difference is consent.
#8 Come Again?

“Civil liberties lobby” that’s a ridiculous way of saying people who value individual liberties.
#9 Homeowners Hold Housing Hostage, Keeping It Away From People Who Can Live In The House

Construction workers do not "provide" housing.
Miners and loggers provide housing. Construction workers, in fact, do the opposite of providing housing. They take the material created to build housing, hold them hostage for payment of labor, and refuse to work without pay.
Just about as dumb.
MichaelFowlie:
That’s like saying supermarkets don’t “provide” food.
But experts say that people are most often wrong and tend to see the members of the opposite party as more extreme than they actually are. "We're flattening people out in terms of our view of them," Tania Israel, author of Beyond Your Bubble: How to Connect Across the Political Divide, Skills and Strategies for Conversations That Work, told NPR. "And we're not really seeing the full complexity of people on the other side."
#10 "YoU mIsSpElLeD CaPiTaLiSm!"

Ah, the old "Managers and CEO's sit around and get paid while the little guys do all the work!" trope.
#11 It's Not Like The Advent Of Streaming Services Had Anything To Do With It

I didn't get shot when I stopped funding Blockbuster.
Erthwerm:
Quick somebody ask her if she still has a DVD/Blu-Ray player or if she just streams/downloads stuff.
#12 “Anticapitalist Etsy Shop”

This is what happens when leftoids change the definition of capitalism from "the free market" to "when exclusively non-workers own the means of production". Just let them have their fantasy, you can't have a discussion with people who change the definitions of words.
ICantBelieveItsNotEC:
Everyone is against capitalism until they suddenly realise that they can be a capitalist too.
But 'tis the nature of socialization online. And nowadays, most of us do get our news and express our political opinions on social media. Most of us know that political discussions online are usually pointless and only cause our blood pressure to rise. But that toxic environment doesn't come out of nowhere; it's created by people. And some researchers suggest that netizens who choose to participate in political discussions online might already be uncivil.
#13 I Would Like To File A Complaint

A country that enforced a mandatory gun buy back program now passing more authoritarian policies?
Shocker.
#14 Because We All Know Taxes Actually Go Towards War And Not "Social Programs"

They go towards "social programs" too, but most of the money is spent on bureaucracy and corruption, and government always pays far too much money compared to companies, so very little actually money actually ends up in the pockets of the poor as a result. We've spent 15 trillion on the war on poverty so far, and the rate is still the same.
opaqueperson:
As a disclaimer, let's not jump on the bandwagon to say Amazon (or the "rich") doesn't pay taxes. Amazon does pay the legally required taxes, or the IRS would be hounding them. They just make little to no profits so they pay limited income taxes, due to losses, costs, and other totally normal, totally legal situations. And of course #TaxationIsTheft
#15 Are You Kidding Me?

What's hilarious is that capitalists are literally eating the rich at the moment. Much more so than any dumb a*s wannabe commie or hippy ever has or will. It may not be long term. It wont effect them much in the end. But the little people are definitely showing the rich people that we can use their own dirty tricks against them.
Whiprust:
LibCaps are often just as class conscious as Socialists of any type. We all eat the rich, but what State Socialists usually don't realize is that the government is what's feeding the rich in the first place. If anything the whole r/WSB debacle is proving that you can't eat the rich until you eat the government.
Researchers Michalis Mamakos and Eli Finkel studied politically engaged users' behavior on Reddit. They found that those who facilitate a toxic environment on non-partisan subreddits do the same thing on political ones.
"Our findings suggest that online political discourse is uncivil largely because the people who opt into it are generally uncivil," Mamakos said. "Such individuals undermine the democratic values that should be present in the public sphere."
#16 Oh, Americans Hate The Bill Of Rights Now? The USA Is Screwed. From The Grovel Institute

The constitution includes voting rights, banning slavery, and the Bill of Rights; more specifically, it includes amendments that guarantee you can speak out on tyranny (1st Amendment), resist them invading your life (4th Amendment), and guarantees you can back those rights (and others) up with force (the 2nd Amendment, our favorite amendment).
I can understand wanting to amend the constitution, but when someone wants to throw nearly 30 of those amendments that have accumulated over 300 years, and start a new one... really f**king sus.
VoidAgent:
I think some people simply do not fully grasp how integral to the existence of the United States the Constitution is. To them, it’s more like...a really famous Congressional bill or maybe a Supreme Court ruling. Important, but we could probably do without it. In actuality, it is the document that outlines that which the US is built upon. Without the Constitution, the United States is simply not the United States anymore.
#17 What If I Don't Declare My Job ?

Every time you buy something the government takes a slice. Own property, government takes a slice. Die, government takes a slice.
It’s not like employment is the only tax government collects.
molotok_c_518:
Use a service? Taxed.
Use a utility? Taxed.
If the government could find a way to tax air, you know they'd be all over that.
#18 North Korea And China Are Champions Of Human Rights

Update:
It looks like UN Watch is an organization devoted to critiquing the UN, and this tweet was sarcasm.
https://unwatch.org/
The "[Stuff] Statists Say" subreddit is the place for netizens with slightly anarchistic views. Yet we have to be exact here: anarchism and anti-statism are two different things. Anarchists are usually against establishments of any kind, believing that all governments are (or are destined to become) evil. Anti-statists tend to be more moderate, believing in the minimization of state and its power.
#20 It’s Almost Like This Isn’t A Case Of The State Forcing The Economy To Shut Down And Then Claiming Credit For It Getting Better Once They Allow It To Open Again... Are People Seriously Dumb Enough To Buy This Propaganda?




