#1 Pyramid Of The Sun In Teotihuacan, Mexico. 1900 vs. 2023
#2 Caerphilly Castle, Caerphilly, South Wales. 1855 vs. 2024
#3 The Ruins Of Tikál, Guatemala. 1890 vs. 2023
The images in this list that compare the same place in two different moments in time are called rephotographs. They provide us with a then-and-now view of the same site and allow us to document the changes that are happening for various purposes.
To know more about this fascinating kind of photography, we reached out to photographers Mark Klett and Garry Pycroft, who dabble in then-and-now photography, and they kindly agreed to share their experience with us.
#4 Noorabad Bridge, Morena, India. 1829 vs. 2010
#6 Eilean Donan Castle, Taken Sometime Before 1911 vs. 2020
Pycroft starts by explaining that there are two types of fundamental approaches to rephotography. The first is quite straightforward—the image connects two photos, one before and one after. Meanwhile, the second is more artistic—it blends the two images to create the appearance of the past being in today's environment.
"My images fall into category 2. I should also state that I consider myself probably the most travelled "rephotographer" in the world. My website, Voyageur Du Passe, shows my images from the USA, Canada, the UK, France, Hungary, and Switzerland."
#7 Mortuary Temple Of Hatshepsut, Luxor, Egypt. 1880 vs. 2022
Pycroft decided to dabble in rephotography because he simply loves the entire process.
Whereas photographer Mark Klett tells us that what drew him to rephotography is the curiosity about what has happened to the scene or place shown in an older photograph.
"What has changed, and what does it look like now? It’s a kind of time warp to stand in the same place where a historical photograph was made long ago. It’s an often unexpected and eye-opening experience."
#10 Moai Statues In Rano Raraku, Easter Island. 1914 vs. 2019
#12 Outdoor Theater, Bucharest, Romania. 1916 vs. 2016
The photographers tell us that the whole rephotography process essentially encompasses finding where the original photograph was made and making a new photograph from the same exact spot.
"Exactness and skill in relocating the location can make the difference in how convincing the rephotograph looks," notes Klett.
"Also important can be trying to match the original picture’s lighting, time of day, and year. A kind of visual detective work is often needed to do this kind of work with accuracy."
#13 Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C., U.S. 1917 vs 2020
#15 Roman Baths And Abbey, England. 1890 vs. 2024
Meanwhile, Pycroft differentiates 3 stages to producing such images:
"The discovery phase: this is where I search for old postcards of the location I intend to visit. I also need to research if the old buildings still exist and their exact location within the target town.
The on-site photography: I am excited when I find the building and realize that I can photograph it. Many times, the opportunity cannot be completed, maybe due to trees and shrubs masking the site or renovations that hide the building.
The creative phase is where I merge the two images together. And the joy it brings when I see that I've accomplished another image," he shares.
#16 Seljestadjuvet In Odda, Norway. 1905 vs. 2022
#17 Machu Picchu In 1912 After Major Clearing Work Had Been Undertaken vs. 2023
When it comes to the significance of rephotography, Klett says that "the process can show changes that have occurred over time, but the pictures alone can’t explain the reasons for change. The process can also tell us something about how individual photographers made choices and decisions about what and how to make their photographs."
"I've completed several exhibitions here in France, and a consistent theme is that it highlights the heritage that remains in the town," adds Pycroft. "Very often I hear locals complaining about how the town has changed, but my images show that maybe there has been quite a change, but there still remains a beauty in the town. And it highlights some of the history to be found."
