If a movie is successful, then it is almost certain that the movie creators will want to make a sequel. But sometimes the creators don’t really know where to stop and keep making more parts if there’s no story left to tell. People often say that the sequels are never as good as the first movie, but Reddit user u/karma_hit_my_dogma wanted to know what movies actually had a good second part but should have stopped there.
The thread was upvoted 47k times and 29k people came to share their opinions. Redditors came to a consensus that Home Alone is the franchise that shouldn’t have been continued after the second movie with 28k people upvoting this comment.
What movies do you think were best left with two parts and do you agree with any of the submissions in this list? Tell us your opinions in the comments and if you find a submission you agree with, don’t forget to upvote it!
More info: Reddit
#23
The Mighty Ducks.
D2 was sooo good, but 3 was just nowhere near the same level.
Report
49points
#24
Poltergeist
Sure probably after 1, the second had moments, but after that it became a giant mess and Heather O' Rourke died.
49points
#25
Expendables cause they made 3 PG 13 and not rated R which really affected it all.
Report
47points
#26
Tyler Perry's Madea franchise.
There are currently 11 movies, with another one coming out next year.
45points
#27
Lol Cinderella. 2 was okay. 3 was... a twist.
41points
#29
Psycho. I think 2 was a bad idea myself, but it happened and having “what happens to Norman later on” was a fun thing to explore, but 3 and 4 were totally unnecessary and I’m surprised Anthony Perkins signed on.
Report
37points
