#1

#2

#3

When talking about history in general, historian Sean Stewart says, "History can be defined in many ways, but for me, I think it's useful to mark a distinction between the concept of "the past" and the concept of "history." The past is simply factually what happened. Most of this is lost to time. Things aren't recorded, or the records are lost," he explained.
"Consider your own past; can you remember factually what you did at 10:00 on the 8th of June, 2015? If there is no record of it, then probably not. Expand this to the rest of humanity."
#4

#5

#6

Fascinated with the distinction between history and the past, he continued contemplating. "The past is like the past simple tense in English. It states a bare fact about the past. "I ate breakfast at 900." Ok, fine. History, by contrast, is more like the present perfect tense. It's essentially a present tense that references the past, but it's really about the present/future," he said.
"So, "I have eaten breakfast." The eating happened in the past, but the real point of the sentence can be the unspoken but understood "....and so now we can leave to go to work." Or "....and so I'm not hungry now." It's really about our actions NOW."
#7

#8

#9

Surprisingly, when we asked Stewart about the historical event people should know about more, none in particular came to his mind. "Most is lost. It depends, on who YOU are, and what YOU believe is important NOW. The stories you find in the past will then influence which stories (of those that remain known to us) you will teach, make films about, or write about," he told Bored Panda.
#10

#11

#12

Writer and philosopher George Santayana once wrote, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” However, Stewart doesn't seem to agree with it, as both those who learn and don't learn about it are doomed to repeat it.
#13

#14

#15

"I say, [historical amnesia] happens all the time. The academic art of history, after all, is rummaging around in old archives trying to "remember" and bring to a wider audience today things that were once well-known by previous generations. We'd just forgotten it over the centuries. And ultimately, knowing things always depends on what you wish to accomplish in today's world. One thing is certain...knowing things in and of itself is not a preventative; we know all about several historical genocides, but that does very little to stop them from happening again and again."
#16

#17

#18

"Given that most of the past is lost (not written down, or the objects have been lost, or the records changed or destroyed), then the cost of forgetting the past is known to us....we're living it now, and have always been living it. Before the invention of writing around 4k years ago, stories (history, the past) were kept alive only through oral tradition. As you can imagine, for over 100,000 years, we have been working as a species without anything like the modern concept of history. Most of our species' existence has been lived without remembering documented history, as we understand it today. We survived, somehow or other," he further explained.
#19

#20



