Never let the facts get in the way of a good story. This applies more often than not when it comes to the world of moviemaking, with the exception of documentary films.
Throughout the years, our favorite Hollywood blockbusters have been feeding us lies - but it's all in the name of entertainment. When it comes to historical dramas, scriptwriters can get particularly creative.
Take the 2019 movie Mary Queen of Scots, for example, which had many historians hot under the collar. The film was marketed as a gripping biopic of two royal cousins, Mary and Elizabeth, and highlights tensions between England and Scotland during their reigns.
But you might be surprised to know that in real life, the cousins never actually met face to face...
#2

#3

"Some historians say that if the queens had met, Elizabeth might have felt differently about sanctioning Mary’s tragic ending," reports the BBC.
Critics have also pointed out the fact that in the movie, the Queen of Scotland (as expected) had a Scottish accent. "Mary grew up in France and therefore would almost certainly have had a French accent, unlike Mary in the film who sounds very Scottish indeed," reveals the BBC.
#4

No.
No, Sir.
You have a grade three concussion and will need months of slow recovery and will probably never be the same again.
#5

#6

The other way Bugs has influenced culture is in the word “nimrod” coming to mean “idiot”. People think that because that’s what he calls Elmer Fudd. But Nimrod was a legendary hunter, and Bugs was being sarcastic.
Another Hollywood hit that had us on the edge of our seats while "learning" about history was the multi Oscar-winning Titanic.
We were led to believe that many back then thought the ship was invincible. And at one point in the film, Rose DeWitt Bukater’s mother looks at the vessel and says, "So, this is the ship they say is unsinkable."
Historians have been calling bull for years, saying that movie-makers merely added that false fact as spice, so that the sinking would be all the more dramatic when it did eventually happen.
#7

#8

#9

Dude, yet get a buffet for breakfast, lunch, and dinner and you WASTE IT? Some people in this world are starving and some can't afford this much food. That is like a week's maybe two week's worth of food on that table kid, eat it.
Some kid in real life is eating Ramen that they got on sale and is sitting in their apartment building with screaming neighbors watching these movies. I know because I was that kid.
If you're old enough to remember The Sound of Music, you might know that it was based on a real-life family and a true story. But actually, the hills were alive with a few white lies...
"The main issue is the family’s escape," explains the BBC. "In the film, the von Trapp family wants to escape Austria after Captain von Trapp is conscripted into the navy, but refuses. If the von Trapp family had indeed run away in the direction of the Alps, and travelled through them, they would have ended up in Germany - the last place they wanted to be." (The film is set in Hitler's era)
According to the BBC, the von Trapp family actually escaped over the train tracks behind their villa before boarding a train to Italy. A day later, the Austrian borders were closed.
#10

Edit: yes, I know that actual newborns should not be on film sets. I was just pointing out how the movie versions of newborns are still inaccurate lol.
#11

#12

Sometimes, despite their best intentions, film-makers paint fiction as fact. In the case of Gladiator, history consultants were brought onboard to ensure accuracy in the film. But even then, not all the elements were on point.
In the movie, the Roman Emperor, Marcus Aurelius, is loses his life at the hands of his son, Commodus. Experts say in reality, he passed away from natural causes. Commodus, meanwhile is taken down in the gladiator arena by Maximus. Incorrect, say some historians. His life really ended in the bath because of a professional wrestler called Narcissus.
#13
Not only does that typically not work but if it did it would take you about 5-10 minutes of holding it over their mouth for it to work in the sense it maybe would knock them out for a minute or two.
#15

Braveheart is another blockbuster that led us down the path of deception. In the film, we are taught that William Wallace, who led the Scottish rebellion against Edward I, was awarded the title of ‘Braveheart’.
Not true, apparently. That honor was apparently given to someone called Robert the Bruce, who later became the King of Scots.
#17

#18

There’s more though, notes the BBC. "William’s kilt wouldn’t have existed when he was alive. Braveheart is set in the 13th century, and kilts weren’t invented until the 16th century. Oops."
The media outlet explains that clansmen would have actually worn "yellow tunics called ‘leine croich’ in battle, dyed with either saffron if they were wealthy, or urine if they weren’t."
#19

#20

Granted comics made this a thing, so most are just copying.
also i was a mover for 9 years, I was not once offered "another way to pay" .....stupid movies.





