Meta Visions has posted 999 photos of pure nonsense on Instagram since 2017, and it has clearly made an impact on people, as the page currently has over 440k followers. The photos are a mix of confusing images out of context and images taken at just the right time. Many feature animals looking out of their element and objects that just don’t seem right. As you go through this list of our favorite posts from the page, try not to intellectualize many of them. The photos can be seen as individual pieces of art that really do speak for themselves.
In terms of the name of the page, it is just as elusive as the photos it shares. The definition of meta is “showing or suggesting an explicit awareness of itself or oneself as a member of its category: cleverly self-referential”, which might be why almost every caption on the account includes the word meta. The captions reference the page itself, but the images are not all “meta” by definition.
Including the word “visions” in the page’s name also adds to the mystery of the page. Whether these visions are supposed to be exercises of the imagination, dreams, trances or supernatural revelations is up to the audience to interpret. Perhaps it is because the photos are usually so confusing and bizarre that they don’t even seem real. These hilariously strange images are more like visions than actually pictures because they need to be decoded. Well, they don’t need to be, but they are not very straightforward. Scrolling through meta visions can lead followers to question what they know, like the laws of gravity or if they are seeing things. Sure, it’s just a fun Instagram account, but spend enough time on there, and you might be having visions of your own too.
Part of the appeal of bizarre images that are hard to understand is that they are so shocking. On the average day to day, most of us are not confronted with anything new. We wake up, eat the same breakfast, go to work and see the same people, then come home to our comfortable routines. There is nothing wrong with that; consistency can actually be very healthy. But because seeing anything interesting or surprising is not built into most people’s daily routines, we tend to be captivated by pages like Meta Visions. If you live in New York City and see crazy things every time you leave your apartment, these photos might not be as entertaining to you. But to see something odd, and to have it captured in a photo, that is a special experience for many people.
While most of the photos featured on Meta Visions are not intentionally deceptive, many of them do prove how easily images can trick us. We may know that a picture is tricking our eyes, but sometimes our brain just can’t seem to reconcile what it sees with what is actually happening. According to scientists, the way that pictures deceive the brain is by providing “distillations of objects or ideas into simpler shapes”. Without the dimensions of depth and motion, an image allows for a host of ambiguities. Even in real life, when we see something from far away or very quickly, we might not have caught exactly what happened.
As Nicholas J. Wade wrote about how pictures deceive the brain, “Even at the level of the photograph, the links between pictorial images (the contents of pictures) and objects are tenuous… Pictorial images can be spatialized or stylized; spatialized images (like photographs) generally share some of the projective characteristics of the object represented… Pictures can also be illusions--deceptions of vision so that what is seen does not necessarily correspond to what is physically presented. Most of visual science is now concerned with pictorial images– two-dimensional displays on computer monitors. Is vision now the science of deception?” While that might be a lot to digest, even in 2013, before Instagram was rampant with pages posting confusing images, scientists were onto the fact that our eyes love tricking us.
In fact, photos have been used to trick viewers for generations. According to Iain Stanley at Fstoppers, “For as long as photography has existed, the art of deception has been front and center of the craft.” He explains that photos have always been able to trick unsuspecting viewers, but nowadays, with all of the advancements in editing software and AI technology, a photographer has no limits. These innovations should not come as a surprise, though, as Iain notes that even when Abraham Lincoln was running for president, he asked photographers to retouch pictures of him to make his neck appear shorter and his disposition more youthful. Who knew good old Honest Abe would have been an avid user for Facetune had it been available during his time?
Iain goes on to write that apparently Joe McCarthy also utilized some clever “cut-and-paste scissor work” to hurt the reputation of one of his biggest competitors, Senator Millard Tydings. Even Stalin demanded that disgraced party members like Tolstoy and Molotov be airbrushed out of official photographs. And you know that famous photo of Michael Jackson dangling his baby out of a hotel window in Paris? There were supposed to be security guards there too, but the newspapers didn’t want to print that image. There are plenty of discussions today about how ethical it is to edit Instagram photos or photoshop women’s bodies on magazine covers, but these techniques are nothing new.
